Monday, March 1, 2010
JUAREZ CARTELS AND FRIEDMAN
The ethical thing to do was to capture the criminals which is capture the policemen that were in on it and capture the government. But you need to start with the head of the organization which is the president. He covers up for the wrong doings of the cartels because he funds them. Friedman believes that the government should not play a role in what the people do. They should play a small role but hardly any. He believes in free market economy system. The cartels that is how they work they do their things legally or illegally. The majority of the stuff they do is illegal but the government has no say in what they do. The government has no say because they are in on it.
The problem here is with corruption how are they going to find a president who is not corrupt and is willing to run for office without getting death threats from the cartels. The answer is that there is no on because they all like to get paid their huge sums of money to keep their mouth shuts. So until there is someone who is man enough to stop the cartels and stop their free market economy then there will always be cartels.
Their free market economy starts off with their soaring sales in cocaine marihuana and other chemical drugs that they distribute to the U.S. they do not get charged taxes because they do not get caught. They also have businesses were they do not get taxed as long as the money they are making goes to the well being of the cartels then no one gets involved and no one gets mad. They use the money for legit businesses in any field the majority is in the automotive field like and also truckers.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/02/28/mexico.juarez.arrest/index.html
Monday, February 15, 2010
migrant workers and Marx
When I read this article it made me remember the Harlan County film. The only difference is that in the Harlan county film they wanted better wages and a union so that they could have benefits and healthcare because the majority of the people were dying due to the harmful pollution. The workers in Arkansas were fighting because they wanted justice they wanted their money because it is the only way they could survive. The majority of these laborers come from very low income families or sometime no income families were the only thing there is to do is go hunt for their food or even steal so that they could provide foods for their family so that they will not watch them die. Marx says that when a person works he gets away from his family he gets to involved in his work that he forgets to eat and dies from starvation. Marx also that a person looses himself in his job that he doesn’t not even know who he is this Marx calls alienation. These workers leave their families in order to find a better life.
The majority of the workers in Mexico do not make the sufficient amount of money to support their families and buy their necessities. That is why they look for other resources they rather cross the border illegally in order to come to the Unites states and work as a laborer under false social security and name or they smuggle drugs or sell drug or even smuggle people. They do this to survive to help their families and to provide food for their families. The United States is filled with workers who are working illegally but if the immigrations laws would change then the migrant worker could work here legally. That will not happen because everyone is scared that the migrant workers will come in and take their jobs that is why the borders have not opened their doors.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/13/us/13brfs-MIGRANTSWIN2_BRF.html
Monday, February 1, 2010
JOHN LOCKE AND DRUG CARTELS
The ethical issue here is a fight for territory. This fight for territory is between three cartels the Familia Michocana the gulf cartel that includes the Zetas and the Sinaloa cartel. The cartel of Baja California is also among one of the cartels that joins this fight but is slowly dismantling with the killings of several of its leaders this cartel is falling day by day. John Locke says that land is common because nature is the owner of land. When a person joins forces with the common then the land is theirs. These cartels are putting forth their energy and growing their crops. Does this make them theirs? In Locke’s theory yes it does. Is it ethical no it is not because in turn they are destroying the lives of thousands of people they are destroying families and killing others? They do not care the major thing for them is to hoard away their money and make their lucrative empire bigger then what it already is. These drug smugglers make 109 million dollars on a daily basis. This money goes to their empires and about 50 percent of it goes to paying off their hitmen cops and government officials.
Another ethical issue here pertains to their trading routes among the borders. They enter through either El Paso Laredo Nogales or Mexicali. The Laredo entry port is the biggest port because it is home to much commerce that enters the U.S. The drug cartels fight for these routes because they need these routes to send their drugs through to make money. If one cartel gets a hold of the border patrol agents of one of these entry ports then that agent may or may not let that cartel in or nay other one. But one that is crooked may let only one cartel pass and may catch the rest. The ways in which they know it’s their cartel is because they give these men passwords and these men let them go by their password. Are these routes theirs? John Locke would say yes because they are making the labor to get the trucks their and to pay off the border patrol agents. Is it ethical no because these cartels are making money by killing off innocent people with their drugs.
These cartels are dangerous and will do anything to get their drugs across the border. Mainly they will do anything to get their money and be powerful.
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20090415_when_mexican_drug_trade_hits_border
Movie-Documentray Drug Wars:Silver or Lead
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Lehman Brothers
Monday, January 18, 2010
ARISTOTLE
On December of 2009 in the international rights forum there was an article on how men have been hit hard by the economic crisis in Hong Kong. This means that their wives or the women of Hong Kong have to go out and look for jobs. Women are treated worse than men and they work harder and they get paid less. There is about twice as many women than men in Hong Kong and they work under the harshest conditions they get paid way less than the men. They also get discriminated against in various ways. They get fired if they become pregnant and if they try to file a complaint against being fired the company usually beat their case because the women can’t provide proof of being mistreated. When a women becomes pregnant and is working in a factory and she does not want to quit they usually push her to quit by giving her more hours and making her work in an unsafe environment were its too hot or the achiness that person is using are old and are about to break down somewhere she is more likely to become injured that way she could see that she has to quit or endanger her Childs live.
The ethical issue is the following are these conditions that the women are in considered to being in slavery conditions? Are they just normal work conditions that are approved by their country or by The United States? The problem that the U.S. has no say on what goes on in Hong Kong they work on their own problems with their own government. The Hong Kong government does not see anything wrong with this picture the women are there and their working and they are making them money that’s all they see. When the truth is that they are working like slaves they work extended hours at a pay that is less then minimum wage. They work in unsafe enviorments and they could be killed with the fumes that the factories let out. So is this slave work yes it is. Aristotle says that a person” is naturally a slave and a master is naturally a master.” He also says that it is only right to have slaves under certain conditions. He regards slaves as “living tools that produce something for their masters”. These women who are working in Hong Kong are what Aristotle calls “living tools”. There are living slaves.
This problem is not just found in Hong Kong its found all over In China in Mexico there is women who also work in harsh conditions and do not get paid well . The women in Mexico have to go to Juarez and work in horrible conditions and get paid not as much as the men for doing twice the labor. They also have to worry about being killed or abused or even kidnapped on the way home from work. These aren’t good working or living conditions. This happens in all industries in corporations as well. Take a company like Wal-Mart for example they employ hundreds of thousands of workers. These workers are not working under the best conditions either. Their vendors have to meet the requirements for Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart puts their own prices on the things they buy if the vendor cannot meet with the Wal-Mart requirement they lose that business and millions of dollars. Wal-Mart is not the only company that does this. Every company that have globalized has done or are doing this. Would you say these people are slaves off course they are.
Refernces-http://www.laborrights.org/rights-for-working-women/news/12231-For Article
Wal-Mart-The High cost of Low Price-Movie
Aristotle Book one Ch3